View Single Post
  #55   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
George George is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,907
Default OT Neighbor (rant)

HeyBub wrote:
dgk wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:08:47 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
wrote:

Change you can believe in. Fast track to government take
over.

I believe in my government - I own part of it. I have no faith in
corporations that exist only to enrich themselves. Given the choice,
and that is the choice, I'll take the government.

Sorry you don't believe in our government. Perhaps you'd be happier
somewhere else.


Private enterprise creates wealth; governments destroy wealth.

The commercial mindset depends upon voluntary contracts and eschews force.
Unfortunately, governments must exist to compel compliance with these
voluntary contracts - as such, governments are a cost of doing business
(like giving away paper bags). The only private business that has the
wherewithal to compel compliance is the Mafia.

As for corporations enriching themselves, they don't. They don't take the
money and put it in a mattress or destroy it, they use it to create jobs and
more wealth. It is governments that do the equivalent of burning money.


That would be all cute and nice except for all of the pirates in the
banking/investment sector who recently demonstrated what greed due to
lack of regulation can do.


There is almost nothing that private enterprise can't do cheaper than a
government. Military? Most wars have been fought by mercenaries or militias.
If we need an army, we could hire one. Police? There are FAR more private
security guards in my city than cops. Fire protection? 85% of America's fire
fighters are volunteers. And what has any branch of government ever done
regarding bubble-baths or bee-bites?

Even Walmart (according to one study funded by Walmart) has done more to
improve the standard of living for lower and middle-class people than all
the government programs combined (food stamps, AFDC, Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, etc.). "...Wal-Mart saved American consumers $236
billion in 2004, or $2,239 for the average American household..."
http://www.manufacturingnews.com/new...09/furman.html


And it is ironic that most of the people who need to "save money at
walmart" need to do so because walmart was a major player in the loss of
their previous good jobs because they demanded lower and lower prices
from their suppliers causing most to go off shore.


Heck, just today, a study was released showing the presence of a Walmart
reduces obesity among its patrons!
http://boards.ign.com/current_events.../180289454/p1/

No, as George Will once said: "Government should protect the borders and
deliver the mail. When they prove competent at those tasks, we might trust
them with something else."