"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
nightjar cpb@ wrote:
"Grimly Curmudgeon" wrote in message
news
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "nightjar" cpb@insert my surname
here.me.uk saying something like:

There is a lot more oil in the ground that we can extract than the peak
oil
adherents would like us to believe.
Ah, but.
Are you an advocate of sitting on our arses and doing nothing because
you say there's more there than we think there is? Doesn't matter when
it will run out, it will run out for sure at some point and if we
haven't got off our arses and got something in place to compensate, we
will have a very bleak future indeed.

One of the fallacies is that oil will run out suddenly.

Last year it did run out suddenly.

Not as 'in the ground' but as refinery and extraction capacity.

With the result that prices rose, various non-conventional sources became
worth while exploiting, giving some increase in capacity, while demand
reduced until it matched supply. It is a self-limiting system and quite
different from the question of oil reserves.

There are complex reasons why its actually less profitable to pump more
oil. Or build more capacity.


We have decades, possibly a century or more, to do something, even after
supplies start to fail. For my money, that ought to be investing in algal
oil, which uses human and animal waste to replicate how nature created
oil, without the multi-million year wait, without the need to take up any
fertile land, with lots of CO2 being consumed from the atmosphere and
with fertiliser as a by-product.

Colin Bignell
Figures dont add up sadly.

The only figures that don't add up at the moment are the costs - currently
$800 a barrel. However, that is for a laboratory level production and a
ten-fold reduction in cost for full production is not an unrealistic target.

Colin Bignell