Talking about 1 Ghz twisted pair is a serious joke.

You're an idiot.

I smell Hallerts. Is that you you dumb-**** Pommy *******? You knew
nothing about audio last time I swore at you and now you're trying to
talk telecom. **** off!!

I'm not interested in your pathetic opinions or your ad homs. Any
dickhead can call someone an idiot, trying to appear as if he has a
clue what he's on about. Obviously your just a troll who knows nothing
about basic telecom.


They get that by
using all 4 pairs on the cable, plus multiplexing. There's simply no
way that twisted pair will ever catch up with coaxial cable and you
simply cannot use a twisted pair line at 1 Ghz.

It isn't "at 1GHz" idiot.


You can't even tell the difference between a Ghz and Gb/s and that's
because you don't understand basic eectronics. That's what kind of
technically challenged dumbass you are. Go back to school clown.


The big push on
twisted pair is due to how much more easily it can be installed than
coax.

No, it isn't. It is for a more easily managed full duplex mode.


Oh, my...the troll knows big words. Full-duplex and half duplex have
got nothing to do with what I'm talking about. If you were using coax,
you'd use a data highway with taps on it. You can't run twisted pair
like that because it has a length limit of 100 metres, including the
patch cables. So you run it as a hub because the individual lengths
are unlikely to exceed 100 metres in a hub.

Have you ever asked yourself why twisted pair has such a limit? Do you
understand waveguide theory, or what capacitance and inductance does
to twisted pair at high frequency? Do you understand skin effect? The
only skin you're likely to know anything about is what might be left
on the end of your dick.

You understanding of telecom is about zilch. I'm used to fat, ****
trolls like you who have no life and nothing better to do than comment
on blogs and newsgroups.


Again, the only real advantage is a skinnier cable and the
ability to hot-plug the units.

You're an idiot. Optics are serial too, yet they can reach speeds that
are beyond the comprehension of a twit like you... apparently.


Holy ****. I've seen some dumb trolls but you're in the running to
take the cake. 'Optics??'. You're talking about the transmission of
light down a glass rod. What has that to do with twisted pairs of
copper? Are you really that stupid?

Charges travelling through copper have to contend with the impedance
of the conductor pairs.That impedance increases dramaticaly with
frequency and is limiting well below 1 Ghz. Also, at higher
frequencies, the charges start to use the skin layer of the copper.
Coax is designed for that and it can handle 1 Ghz with ease.

Why you would compare either of those to photons of light travelling
down a glass rod beats me. Can you seriously not understand why light
travels faster in a serial mode than electrical charges in a copper
medium? What a dumbass.


It just makes no sense to push data transfer one bit at a time when
you can do it 32 or 64 bits at a time in parallel.

You're an idiot. The interface is far faster than the read speed of the
drive. Serial attachment is fine.


That was my point **** face. You need to buffer them anyway, but the
processor needs to do more work than being involved in data transfers.
It leaves much of it up to the DMA controller but the faster you can
transfer data the better all around. There is no advantage of using
SATA over PATA, other than smaller cables and hot-plugging, so why
change technology in mid-stream? If you weren't so stupid, you'd be
able to see that it's make people a lot of money.

It's been a long time since I kicked a troll's ass. Thanks for being
my bum boy.