View Single Post
  #79   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,uk.d-i-y
Dave Plowman (News) Dave Plowman (News) is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default Bit of a Con Really - Follow-up ...

In article ,
William Sommerwerck wrote:
I don't have the time to discuss this at length, but NTSC's unfortunate
reverse-acronym was the result of poor studio standards, and is not
inherent in the system. PAL incorporated phase alternation to partly
compensate for transmission problems (non-linear group delay) in Europe.


IIRC, nowt to do with studios, but the transmission process. Hence the
tint control on NTSC sets which is absent on PAL ones.

If I remember my BBC training correctly, NTSC gives theoretically better
'studio' pictures than PAL. Obviously ignoring line and frame frequency.
PAL best for VTR recording, and SECAM the best for transmission.

--
*Pentium wise, pen and paper foolish *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.