Bit of a con, really ... ?
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Bob Larter" wrote in message
...
William Sommerwerck wrote:
Well, on some newer models you have a feature called "Live View",
where you can use the LCD to focus, etc, but no serious photographer
would use that in preference to the traditional viewfinder.
As I pointed out earlier, the LCD is a great way to fine-tune the color
balance in real time.
It'll certainly tell you if you're using the wrong WB setting, but it's
no substitute for checking the RAW image on a calibrated CRT.
Yes, BUT WHAT IF YOU NEED AN IMMEDIATE IMAGE AND CAN'T PROCESS THE RAW
DATA!!!!!!
I do not understand what an immediate image is. If I want an immediate
image, I use my eyes.
If I want a record, I take a photograph. Which has to be do9wnloaded
ontp a copmputer or printed out to be any use.
So what on earth are you on about?
In all fairness, he could be talking about plugging his camera into a
printer & printing directly to it. I personally don't think that gives
acceptable quality, but there are plenty of people who wouldn't have a
problem with it.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
|