Bit of a con, really ... ?
William Sommerwerck wrote:
I was making the point that Live View is a good way to get accurate color
balance at the time the photo is taken, especially under light sources
without continuous spectra. The issue is not whether a camera can take
raw
and compressed images at the same time, but whether one /needs/ a
properly
balanced JPG image /right away/. This is impossible with a raw file.
And how would you suggest that someone gets around that problem? It's
not always practical to shoot a white card & create a custom WB at the
time. (And in my case, I can't do it because the light's changing too
fast to get a useful WB from a white card anyway.)
Is deliberately misreading and misunderstanding what people post your
principal hobby?
Nobody else seems to have a problem with my posts.
Again, how do you think that LiveView helps you get a properly
white-balanced JPEG, in camera? Or do you perhaps consider one of the
standard WB settings to be 'properly balanced'? If so, you & I are
talking about two different things.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
|