View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
SteveB[_10_] SteveB[_10_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default More zoning foolishness


"aemeijers" wrote in message
...
willshak wrote:
on 5/14/2009 7:00 PM (ET) HeyBub wrote the following:
"[READING, Ohio] A busty mannequin used to promote a restaurant was back
on the job Thursday.

" 'Bar Be Q' was placed in front of K.T.'s Barbecue in Reading at about
11:30 a.m. Thursday by her owner, Kenny Tessel. The mannequin was
dressed in a more conservative top instead of the bikini that stirred up
controversy earlier in the week."

http://www.wlwt.com/news/19452147/detail.html

They actually have zoning laws prohibiting mannequins in bikinis?


One of the zoning board members must own a competing restaurant.




Well, in this case, I could see banning it as a traffic hazard. Every male
driver rubbernecking to make sure it wasn't a real woman, would be prone
to running into things.

--
aem sends...


In the town of Cedar City, Utah, there is a mannequin on the main street of
town in front of a clothing store, firmly anchored permanently to the
concrete. Every day, the mannequin is stylishly dressed. I used the
opportunity to set up a tripod and take a shot from the back. With my hand
holding a handful of buttocks. The picture is in my pool room. Everyone
who sees it and knows where the mannequin is laughs. No faces are shown to
protect the innocent.

Steve