On May 11, 8:16*am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Robatoy wrote:
On May 10, 1:53 pm, Jack Stein wrote:

Could be true but you would have to ignore the massive effects of
cargo ships of Obama money headed for ACORN and getting 200% of the
people voting for Obama and his socialist horde.

And in what way is that different than Bush money being shoveled by
the coffin-full to KBR/Halliburton and other fat-cat oil companies in
order to get campaign contributions so they can skew the vote?
ACORN is nothing compared to what happened in Florida in 2000. There
the vote was skewed by denying people to vote, not messing with the
registration numbers.

Sigh.

* KBR and Halliburton are not oil companies.
* Oil companies - or any corporation for that matter - may not make campaign
contributions.
* Bush won Florida in 2000 by some 500-odd votes; Acorn is responsible for
many tens of thousands.
* Vote denial in Florida was never litigated. The controversy was over the
counting of the votes.

The controversy was over the fact that many thousands were denied the
right to vote because of convenient purging of the voter lists which
cost the Dems WAY more than those 500 votes. IOW, fraud.
The concept being discussed is fraudulent votes, which ACORN is
accused of orchestrating (maybe accurately accused of doing)
The fact it was never litigated doesn't mean it didn't happen, just
like the fact that Bush hasn't been convicted of war crimes doesn't
exonerate him of being a war criminal.

Your objections fit the narrative but not the facts.

Ahhh yes, facts, a Repuglican specialty. (When it suits them..you
know, the situational kind.. like their ethics and morals.)