DGDevin wrote:

-MIKE- wrote:

I have no disdain for anyone.
My point was that Mrs. Palin has had much more executive experience
than Mr President.

She has more executive experience than Abraham Lincoln did when he became
President too, or JFK for that matter. Would you suggest that she would
make a better potential President than either of them on that basis?

If you figure "community organizer" is the portion of Obama's life that is
the most important when assessing whether he's qualified to be President,
then why not evaluate Palin's qualifications to be Vice President on what
she was doing at an equivalent point in her career--sports reporter.

So, what exactly are we supposed to judge Obama's experience by? If not
his days as a community organizer, then the days he spent working with Bill
Ayers and the Anneburg challenge? That's probably not your most prudent
course of action. His time as a constitutional lecturer? In which, during
an NPR interview he made the statement bemoaning the fact that the
Constitution does not address "redistributive" justice? His time as an
Illinois legislator where his most notable accomplishments were supporting
infanticide and multiple gun control bills including opposing one that
absolved homeowners protecting their own lives with a firearm? Or was it
his 140 days in the Senate before he started running for President? Can you
point to any significant bills that he sponsored or pushed through the
Senate during his 140 days there?

What exactly are The One's accomplishments that made him the leading
candidate from the Democrat party?

--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough