On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:55:40 +0100, in uk.d-i-y geoff
wrote:

In message , Andrew Gabriel
writes
In article ,
John Rumm writes:
The FAQ as it currently stands has attributions with email addresses for
many of the articles. I was proposing to loose the email addresses since
many are probably now out of date, and they poses a slight spam risk
for their owners (they are obfuscated in the code - which helps reduce
the risk significantly). Anyone have any feelings on the matter?

I can't see that you're gaining anything by doing that.
You need to retain details of the copyright ownerships
in any case.

Who has copyright on Andy Hall's contribution ?

Amazingly, none of Andy's numerous contributions are actually in the
FAQ!!!

How about gathering them up into an "Andy Hall of Fame" section in the
Wiki? It would be a real shame if one day Google changed direction and
they got lost. Its happened before... remember deja-vu, altavista.

Anyone up for starting it off with a list of good ones, with pointers
into the Google archive?

Phil