The Medway Handyman wrote:
John Rumm wrote:
The FAQ as it currently stands has attributions with email addresses
for many of the articles. I was proposing to loose the email
addresses since many are probably now out of date, and they poses a
slight spam risk for their owners (they are obfuscated in the code -
which helps reduce the risk significantly). Anyone have any feelings
on the matter?

Having written the pressure washer FAQ, I get e-mails from people all over
the world asking for information. I find this interesting and always try to
help. I'd like that to continue.

Fair point...

perhaps just expunging the addresses that we know to be defunct is a
better way to go?


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/