On Apr 23, 3:08*pm, RickH wrote:
On Apr 23, 9:46*am, "marcodbeast" wrote:

Eric Gisin wrote:
http://article.nationalreview.com/

* Lying right wing crap.

All my environmental choices are generally made on the basis of 2 cost/
benefit calculations:

1) Will I live long enough and will the new equipment live long enough
to recoup the cost and then some (in energy savings) of my purchase?
If there is no big payoff, or risk too high, then I'll keep my
existing equipment or buy standard equipment.

2) Will the new equipment make my life drastically more comfortable
making the expense worth it even if the recoup time doesnt work out as
well? *If not, then I'll keep my existing equipment.

So far a hybrid car over a good-mileage 4 cylinder has not passed the
above test, neither has solar panels on my house, another 8 inches of
insulation, etc. *But weatherstripping my doors had a good cost to
payoff to comfort ratio. *These hollywood stars are on a different
planet alltogether, as is Al Gore who has made around 100 million so
far selling the global warming lie.

The state of Tennesse last year said that algore increased his draw on
the public grid by 10%. He has the money and the time to refurbish his
house and show us that it is possible to reduce the need for carbon
fuels.

There is no point in simply making electricity more expensive if one
is unalble to reduce their needs. Most Americans use very little more
than their essential needs which they cannot cut back.

If the carbon tax does not reduce the use of carbon fuels by
strangulation, it has absolutely no effect upon actual CO2 released.
The governments of Europe and the Obama administration and democrats,
have no interest in the science of AGW, or the facts on CO2 emissions
and atmospheric concentrations, since they relish the money they can
raise from the unjustified tax.

In the meantime, they can give absolutely no outlay of how much
suffering and indirect genocide of old people, working class and
middle class they must have for how much warming they plan to stop by
their program.

According to the Antartica CO2 graphs, the rise in atmospheric CO2 is
linear, (very little change in yearly increases which is probably
primarily caused by the burning of the tropical jungles), while human
output has doubled since about 1970. This means that reductions of
world output by 1/2 cannot be considered to have any effect upon
actual atmospheric concentrations. This means that the complete
elimination of CO2 from the US cannot be considered to have any
effect.

With the steadly increasing output of CO2 from China, India and
developing nations, complete elimination of CO2 from the US would only
delay the actual quantities put into the air by several months.

So the fact should be admitted. There is no possiblity of reducing
world emissions, even if the scaremongering were valid. If there is to
be a climate catastrophe, which is predicted by the evangelist,
algore, elimination of ALL US CO2 can only delay the event by several
months. Certainly not worth the REAL IMPACT on people's lives wished
for by the insane and invalid AGW fanatics.

Yet the AGW fanatics stilll wish to subject Americans to draconian
measures which can only hurt anyone not directly in line to profit. It
is simply a lie that they can bolster the economy by the needless
programs and taxes they envision.

It can be determined that without factual basis for their program to
in any way have merit to affect CO2 levels, the programs are fraud and
a criminal attack against the US.

The consistent omission of pertinent facts can be construed as
criminal intent to commit fraud.

And in the meantime, EPA has no direct science whatsoever to support
their theoretical science of the detrimental effects of CO2 and the
other gases.

KD