On Apr 23, 9:46*am, "marcodbeast" wrote:
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://article.nationalreview.com/

* Lying right wing crap.


All my environmental choices are generally made on the basis of 2 cost/
benefit calculations:

1) Will I live long enough and will the new equipment live long enough
to recoup the cost and then some (in energy savings) of my purchase?
If there is no big payoff, or risk too high, then I'll keep my
existing equipment or buy standard equipment.

2) Will the new equipment make my life drastically more comfortable
making the expense worth it even if the recoup time doesnt work out as
well? If not, then I'll keep my existing equipment.

So far a hybrid car over a good-mileage 4 cylinder has not passed the
above test, neither has solar panels on my house, another 8 inches of
insulation, etc. But weatherstripping my doors had a good cost to
payoff to comfort ratio. These hollywood stars are on a different
planet alltogether, as is Al Gore who has made around 100 million so
far selling the global warming lie.