In article
,
" wrote:

On Apr 5, 6:39*pm, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
In article ,

*Wes wrote:
Joseph Gwinn wrote:

As for manufacture by a HSM, either approach is practical, but the Wyler
approach is far simpler mechanically. *In either case, the electronics
part is dead simple by present-day standards, but was a big deal back in
the 1960s and 1970s.

Are you planning to try it? *Btw, thanks for the list of patents.

I am thinking about making a level. *Don't know if I'll really do it. *
Probably depends on how practical an approach I can dream up.

The big issue to be figured out is how to handle temperature variations.

The original Wyler unit (described in 4,023,413) may be made of fused
quartz, which would be easy for a big company like Wyler to do, but a
problem for me. *I know how, but it would be far too much work. *The
patent mentions quartz as a suitable material. *So, the question is if
quartz is really necessary. *Symmetry may suffice.

The subsequent patent (5,022,264) mentions that the diaphram mass is
made of 0.003" brass foil, which is easy to get and to photoetch. *One
can also use stainless steel, but it must be non-magnetic so the Earth's
magnetic field doesn't cause false tilt readings.

Joe Gwinn

PS. *The German book came, and I was able to read it well enough to see
that it wasn't all that useful. *Most or all circuit diagrams in the
book were clearly wrong (in the sense of being impossible), so I assume
that the authors had no idea how these things actually work. *JMG

fused quartz is a good choice. The quartz you can get from burnt out
halogen bulbs. Procedures in Experimental Physics by Strong has info
on fused quartz. In another life I made coil springs out of fused
quartz.

I have read Strong's book, which is quite good.

One can buy fused quartz from glass suppliers, and work it like glass.
It is possible for an amateur to make lenses and mirrors, and many
people made their own telescopes. Willmann-Bell publishes books on how
to do this. I can see how to wet grind the fused quartz to make the
spherical depressions in the flat plates of the sensor assembly, and to
drill the holes for the connections to the electrodes. However, vacuumn
depositing the electrodes would have to be sent out. Wet silvering
could be used, but that's another whole process.

For the record, the usual way to grind the depressions would be to use a
machined cast iron tool charged with carborundum grit (or diamond grit)
held in a machiine the moves the tool such that its surface describes a
sphere. Mor modern would be a diamond cup curve-generation tool in a
similar machine.

But I don't have the equipment to handle this, and don't want to get it
for a one-off project. So, I'm thinking of alternatives like two glass
sheets, two brass electrodes, a brass shim diaphram, and a pair of
machined ceramic spacers, assembled with epoxy. Or, two circuit boards
with metal faces inward, two brass spacers, and a brass sheet, assembled
with epoxy. And so on. The temperature and humidity coefficients of
the dielectrics are the big issues, as metals are far simpler.

Joe Gwinn