Graham. wrote:
There would appear to be no commonality between the two section of your
post.

His newsreader would certainly benefit from some equipotential bonding,
but I have a theory as to what he might be alluding to.

Go, I'll bite. I wanted to put a smiley here, but since I have done the
reinstal on this computer, not every key is where I think it is. Oh, I
have found them :-)

What do you mean about, 'His newsreader would certainly benefit from some
equipotential bonding,
but I have a theory as to what he might be alluding to.' :-)

People of your knowlege can never upset me, by the way. :-)

I have always been open and honest and willing to learn.


Dave

The equpotential bonding remark was my a light hearted way
of agreeing with Bob's remark about the second paragraph of your
post not (to us) logically following on from the first, by using an
electrical metaphor.
I would certainly have used a ;-) if I thought it would stop you
thinking my intention was to upset anyone.

You snipped my "theory" about using neutral an earth to
distribute the 12V from the wind generator. Was it correct?

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%