"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
...

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
alid...
Ed Pawlowski wrote:

He's right though. This one, the last one, and the one before. 102 years
can
cover three centuries.

That was true in 2001, but not in 2009. Today it would be 110 years.


That can be true for any three centuries. You really only need one year
and two days. I said it CAN cover. It CAN be 1499, 1500, and 1501 too.


That was supposed to be 1601