On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:56:25 -0000, "Peter Hucker"
wrote:

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:11:03 -0000, John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:42:38 -0000, "Peter Hucker"
wrote:


You have admitted you are a troll.

---
The term "admitted" is one _you_ introduced in a pejorative way and one
which I don't subscribe to for reasons I've stated before.

WTF are you on about now? You said you were a troll and that's that.

---
Yes, I said I was a troll, which is way different than an admission.

An admission carries with it guilt, which is what you're trying to heap
on me.

It won't work, because there's nothing about you which carries authority
of any kind.
---

You were boasting about being a very good troll,
or a better troll than me, or something like that.

---
I said nothing of the sort, as I recall.

What I did say was that I reveled in trolling for minnows pretending to
be sharks, and that's why you're on my hook.
---

You have also stated that I am no good at trolling.

---
I said you weren't very good at it, not that you were no good at it.
---

---
Indeed.
---

Therefore I am not one, and must be an intelligent adult.

---
Wrong on both counts.

My saying you're not good at trolling doesn't mean you're not a troll,
it just means that you're a troll who's not good at trolling.

Not knowing the difference also means that you're not an intelligent
adult.

A good analogy might be that of a thief who gets caught a lot. He's not
an intelligent adult because he gets caught a lot, but he's still a
thief.

But I'm not a troll at all.

---
Yes, you are.

JF