On Feb 21, 2:39*pm, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:33:18 -0800 (PST), RangersSuck



wrote:
On Feb 21, 6:00*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:17 -0800 (PST), RangersSuck

wrote:

So, Moulton shot at the back of an unarmed man and missed,
jeopardizing bystanders. Brilliant.

Do you have any cites as to what the backstop was? *Or are you simply
talking out your ass?

Brilliant

Gunner

Dude, the guy escaped, so I think it's safe to assume that the
backstop wasn't impervious to penetration by a human, much less a
bullet.

How so? *Use as much whitespace necessary to show your logic train.

Gunner

"Upon Roosevelt's death in 1945, H. L. Mencken predicted in his diary
that Roosevelt would be remembered as a great president, "maybe even
alongside Washington and Lincoln," opining that Roosevelt "had every
quality that morons esteem in their heroes.""

Go to maps.google.com. Enter the address of the establishment. Look at
the street view picture. Then tell me about how safe it was to be
shooting guns in that neighborhood.

Present the data or a link. *I asked you for the data. Its up to you to
provide it, its not my job to do your research for you.

Gunner


Gunner, I had already done the research for myself and gave you pretty
easy to follow instructions on how to see the data. Since you've
proven unwilling, or incapable of doing that yourself, I'm tempted to
just tell you to **** off. However, in the interest of completeness,
take a look at this:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...249671798,,0,5

Does this look to you like a safe area to be shooting at a moving
target?