On Feb 16, 3:59*pm, " wrote:
On Feb 16, 5:25 pm, RangersSuck wrote:



So, Moulton shot at the back of an unarmed man and missed,
jeopardizing bystanders. Brilliant.

The robber would have been at very close range. *More likely Moulton
fired one round to try to frighten the robber into not running.
Newspapers are not always super accurate. *The reporter probably did
not talk to Moulton. *If the reporter had talked to Moulton, there
would likely have been at least one quoted remark.

Dan

You can't possibly know all of that (except for "Newspapers are not
always super accurate.").