"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:03:09 -0600, "Elliot G"
wrote:


"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:16:18 -0600, "Elliot G"
wrote:


"RangersSuck" wrote in message
...
On Feb 16, 10:16 am, Ben wrote:

Sandovaz dropped the firearm and ran. Moulton fired one shot and
missed, and then he and several store employees gave chase.


So, Moulton shot at the back of an unarmed man and missed,
jeopardizing bystanders. Brilliant.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be interesting to see if he is charged with the shooting. He
should
be, and it should be well publicized. Anyone with a concealed carry
license
should know better. He is actually damn lucky he didn't hit him.

Monday morning quarterbacking is soo much fun, particularly when you
have almost zero data, isnt it?


Don't need much data. Conceal carry is for the purpose of self defense
only.
If someone is unarmed and running away, you don't need to defend yourself.

Even the police would have no right to fire on someone under the
circumstances as described.

That is actually a matter of state law. It varies from state to state.

Some allow one to shoot a fleeing felon, others do not.

Are you allowed to shoot a fleeing arsonist? And why or why not?

Use as much whitespace as necessary.

Ill give you a hint though...
"demonstratably a danger to the public at large"

You can go from there....

Gunner


You're the one that needs a hint, wise ass, and it doesn't matter how much
unrelated dust you try to kick in the air. No one can shoot a person in the
back under those circumstances in any state.