On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:36:12 -0000, John Fields wrote:

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:53:12 -0000, "Peter Hucker"
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:48:55 -0000, John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:14:24 -0000, "Peter Hucker"
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:45:16 -0000, John Fields wrote:

It's easy enough to insert and fix up his post, but most of the time
it's "Why bother?"

Why bother getting a news client that can word wrap when replying? I dunno, ask yourself.

---
Since yours is the source of the problem, why not fix yours?

What causes the problem is irrelevant.

---
You're the cause of the problem, so I'll concede the point and agree
with you.

No, the people who can't interpret a non-carriage returned line are the problem.

What _isn't_ irrelevant is the problem itself and the inconvenience it
causes those who wish to reply to your posts.

They can get decent software.

_Not_ fixing it when, ostensibly, you could with a few key clicks is
raising pig-headedness to a new low and speaks volumes about your
character.

It wouldn't be "fixing" it, it would be "changing" it. I don't want narrow columns of text on my wide screen.


--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

____
_[]_/____\__n_
|_____.--.__()_|
|LI //# \\ |
| \\__// |
| '--' |
'--------------'