dennis@home wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message om...
dennis@home wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message om...
Alan wrote:
In message , The
Medway Handyman wrote

Only just spotted this post. I have never said that active
smoking isn't a cause of lung cancer, plenty of sound scientific
evidence to support that claim. However, the 'evidence'
concerning passive smoking is utter bollox.

Yep, the evidence given out by the tobacco companies about passive
smoking is complete bollox. Go back a generation and they were
telling everyone that low tar cigarettes were also safe.

The tobacco companies haven't published anything about the alleged
dangers of passive smoking.

If they could prove the data is wrong do you think they would have
remained silent?

They no longer have the same spend as the pharmacutical giants. Look it
up.

They have a lot of money at stake to prove smoking is safer and they
can't. I take that to mean that the claims about passive smoking
being dangerous is true.

Then you accept bad science.

You may not agree but as stated you aren't the brightest handyman
about.

Sorry Dennis, personal insults don't support your rabid hysterical
claims.

However the facts do, however you don't understand the facts and try
to justify your misguided beliefs by accusing people that do
understand the facts as being rabid and hysterical. It just adds to
the evidence that you are stupid.

Sorry Dennis, personal insults still don't support your rabid hysterical
claims.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk