On Jan 22, 9:11*am, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Jan 21, 4:47*pm, wrote:



On Jan 21, 12:55*pm, Ignoramus15648 ignoramus15...@NOSPAM.

15648.invalid wrote:
On 2009-01-21, wrote:

This misses 2 important facts:

1) If Obama is successful, Rush thinks that means the country will be
far down the path to socialism- not what I want either.

Now, would it be correct to conclude that "if Obama is unsuccessful",
and we experience collapse that would likely go beyond the Great
Depression, would that lead you on a path that you would want?

--
* *Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
* * * to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
* * * *from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
* * * * *more readers you will need to find a different means of
* * * * * * * * * * * *posting on Usenet.
* * * * * * * * * *http://improve-usenet.org/

It's not necessarily a binary choice. He could fail to make us all
socialists without imploding the country.

And I don't think he's the socailists messiah, either.

Dave- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wan't it Bush who is/was nationalizing the banks?

Sounds like a socialist to me.

TMT

I'm not the one saying he's leading us down that path.

marxist/animal rights nut/tax cheat cabinet members do concern me,
though.


Dave