clumsy ******* wrote:
"Bob Eager" wrote:

but the science is there, even if some rubbish gets written in the
press. "Fanatical religion" is OTT
There's lots of science there, but it doesn't all say the same thing.

if it all said the same thing, I would be suspicious. As it is, over
the last few years of debate, most have accepted its correct, except
for Bush/oil sponsored people of course.
There are still lots of members of the public, who never dream of
arguing with scientific opinion elsewhere, who now suddenly start
questioning this science because its conclusions are inconvenient.
When New Scientist starts saying its all "green****" I will start to
listen, but for now its yesterdays argument, however much arrogant
oafs like Huge try to laugh.

New scientist is a very poor magazine for science. Its is, like New
Socialist, essentially run for political purposes.


The articles are either written by hacks who don't understand what they
are reporting on, or written as populist scare stories.

New scientists are firmly in the green**** camp already.

Surprisingly FOE seem to be half sane.