In article ,
wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:49:12 -0800 (PST), wrote:


The lie is that there was no damage to the building.

I suggest you head to
http://forums.randi.org/

and do some research, but you won't.

Dave

There certainly wasn't enough damage to eplain its collapse. Nor does
that explain the explosions in the building reported by at least one
witness who was actually in the building (Barry Jennings IIRC) who is
now dead under mysterious circumstances.


Jennings heard beams from the collapse of the North Tower hitting
WTC7. Being inside, he didn't have a clue what it was at the time.

"explosion" is just good word for "loud noise". There were lots of
loud noises heard at WTC on 9/11.

There were no sounds or video consistant with man-made demolition.

Nobody that was an eyewitness to the WTC7 collapse says that they think
man-made demolition was the casue.

--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail