DIYbanter - View Single Post

krw[_3_]

In article ,
says...

ian field wrote:

"Peter Hucker" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:32:41 -0000, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:51:13 -0000, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:41:32 -0000, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:33:33 -0000, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:17:35 -0000, William Sommerwerck
wrote:

But the Duracells were lasting only 6 months.
They're cheap smoke alarms.

That's pretty bad. I've been using leftover Toshibas, and
they last at least
a year.

I bought 6 smoke alarms at once, so I went for cheap ones. 99p
on ebay I believe.

Oh, *that's* a smart move. Expected though.

I did of course test them. They detect smoke perfectly well.

GMAFB!

Are you refuting that they detect smoke? What do you want, a video
of me setting one off?

No, dummy, I stating that anyone who would trust their life to a
smoke detector from the .99 store is an *idiot*. I am not refuting
your assertion that you do it or that you _are_ said *idiot*.

They work as advertised, therefore the cost or where they came from is
irrelevant.

Stupid PHucker, as always.

Refute my statement or forever shut the **** up and stop making an ass of
yourself.

And they are to save my house from damage, not my life.

Well, I suppose that pig pen is worth more than your life. You
really are that stupid, aren't you?

I can defend myself against fire, a house cannot.

Hooray - PHuckers going for a Darwin award.

He'll likely get that wrong too.

I didn't know the brain dead could qualify?

I thought you had to be human to qualify. Donkeylanders don't
qualify.

--
Keith