On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:52:24 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

Alang wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:17:14 +0000,
(D.M. Procida) wrote:

This may turn out to be a stupid question, but I have nothing to
prove...

I don't understand why it isn't possible to make roofs cheaply, using
board materials instead of tiles or glass fibre. It's possible to make
boats waterproof, with appropriate sealing materials and pain, so why
not roofs, which have to deal with a lot less water?

It would be convenient and cheap to put large plywood boards on a roof,
make sure that there's some kind of overlap or flexible seal where their
edges meet, and finish them with thoroughly waterproof paint.

I'm assuming that I'm not a genius who has thought of something that has
never occurred to anyone else, and there is a reason why this isn't done
- what is it?

Looking at American DIY programs on TV I saw quite a few houses being
built using boards for the roof and 'shingles' to cover them. The
shingles taking the place of tiles or slates. The system seems to work
okay but I did wonder about longevity. As others have remarked the
slate or tile roof can last hundreds of years with only little
maintenance. My own home is well over a hundred years old and apart
from a few loose slates after a storm last year has had little
attention. I can't see a wooden roof lasting more than a few years at
most without needing repair.

Cedar is good on a south facing gable for about 80 years, but abut 60%
of that on a north facing gable.

Yes. I've heard of roofs being covered in overlapping wooden splits.
Just didn't know what wood. I've seen oak last untreated over a
century on the south face of a building but that would be an expensive
option

The worst roof is felt, then thatch, then shingle, then corrugated iron,
then tiles then slates, then lead/copper, as far as I am aware,
longevity wise.

There are tiles made from resin and powder to mimic slates. Much
lighter though and as yet no knowledge of their useful life. Our local
buiding control office has warned against using them in some
circumstances. Can't recall what they were though.