On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:52:24 -0000, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:04:03 -0000, krw wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:37:16 +0000, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:33:33 -0000, krw wrote:
In article , says...
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:17:35 -0000, William Sommerwerck
wrote:

But the Duracells were lasting only 6 months. They're cheap smoke
alarms.

That's pretty bad. I've been using leftover Toshibas, and they last
at least a year.

I bought 6 smoke alarms at once, so I went for cheap ones. 99p on ebay
I believe.

Oh, *that's* a smart move. Expected though.

I did of course test them. They detect smoke perfectly well.

Ignore krw. He's a nincompoop.

It figures. PHucker and Grease make a fine pair. Add in the Dumb
Donkey, DimBulb, and Slowman and you likely have the entire market
for .99 smoke alarms. Real brains there, Grease.

Try putting some substance into your argument. If I want a conversation like this, I'll go talk to a 6 year old.

I don't have to when you folks do it many times every day for me?

Here we have a classic variant of "I know you are", again, a 6 years old's stance.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

You know you've spent too much time on the computer when you spill milk and the first thing you think is, 'Edit, Undo.'