View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
DoN. Nichols DoN. Nichols is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,600
Default electromagnetic chuck question

On 2008-12-18, RogerN wrote:

"DoN. Nichols" wrote in message
...
On 2008-12-17, RogerN wrote:


[ ... ]

Without knowing the resistance of the mag chuck I'm only
guessing but a 20 ohm 10 Watt resistor could drop up to 20V for 50% duty
cycle giving a 150V peak and the 8uF capacitor most likely won't hold
this
voltage very well during the reverse half cycle. Just guessing I'd
figure
the resistor, diode, and capacitor combination probably supplied close to
a
120VDC equivalent.


O.K. Time to check the resistance of the chuck. Back in a few
minutes ... how about 36K? I don't think that there will be much
ripple, or drop in the resistor once the cap is charged.

That would be 4.7 mA at 170VDC -- or a bit less than 10mV drop
across the resistor. If it were drawing enough to drop half of the
voltage across the resistor, we would need a 360W resistor or so. :-)

But for the short cap charging period, even with the cap bumped
from 8 uF to 2000 uF, the high current is short enough so the average
power in the resistor is well within specs.


Wow, I would have never guessed the chuck resistance to be that high.
Another poster said his chuck was rated for 115VDC at 1.8A. His chuck is
over 200W and your is 0.8W. I was guessing your chuck to average maybe 0.7A
or so. If I'm calculating correctly, you have less than 1 mW power
dissipation in the 10W resistor, they could have used a 1/2W resistor and
still been 500X oversized.


Except during the time of charging the cap. I guess that if you
turned it on and off frequently, you might overheat a 2W carbon
resistor.

The design you made sounds more like a DC power supply. The half wave
rectifier and 8uF capacitor sounded like something that was suppose to
deliver less than the peak voltage. Thinking about it a little bit here,
are you sure that wasn't 0.36K Ohms?


I'm sure -- but what I am *not* sure of is whether there are
problems in the existing winding. It may have been intended to draw
more in the past. I've got to try re-flowing the solder on the
connector and measure again. It is still apart form my looking inside
it when trying to verify the observed resistance.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---