Upscale wrote:


"Doug Miller" wrote in message
Again, the right to bear arms for self-defense is inherent, not something
that
was created by goverment a few hundred years ago.

Funny thing Doug. I feel the same way about health insurance, as something
that is inherent and suscribe fully to it in Canada. Yet, you didn't
hesitate to support Tim with his insistence that it was evil and stealing
from others.

Comment?


Not Doug, but funny thing about health insurance vs. our Bill of rights.
The rights in our BOR don't require that someone else do something to
enable other citizens to exercise those rights. Your health insurance
requires that someone else work and earn the requisite money to be
confiscated to pay for others' health insurance. Seems a pretty simple to
see difference.

And because you can't see any other purpose, there must not be one, eh?

In reality, I can envision plenty of purposes for guns, just not having
them as walking around tools available to the general public.

Yep, like keeping the peasants in line, eh? Either by the armed
government or armed criminal thugs, pretty much the same result.


--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough