Lew Hodgett wrote:
"J. Clarke" wrote:

So how many firearms costing less than 60 dollars are sold in a
given
year? And how many people are shot with them?

You tell me.

Why? You're the one proposing a new law--it's up to you to
demonstrate that it will do what you claim it will. If you don't have
the numbers to back your assertion then you're talking out your ass.

Prove that the problem your solution will address is the problem
that
exists.

Be my guest.

Why should I prove that your solution addresses the problem that you
claim exists?

So you're saying that new wheelweights cost $100 an ounce?

Don't think so.

Then how is it that buying wheel weights at a store for purposes of
casting bullets for reloading purposes is not cost effective when you
are charging your ten dollar a bullet tax?

You really don't seem to have even tried to think this idea of yours
through and when challenged to do so you fall back on glib responses
and attempts to shift the burden of proof. I am curious as to why you
are so resistant to examining your own views.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)