"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in
:


"Han" wrote in message
...
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in
:


"Han" wrote in message

Perhaps one of the two should be a hero for taking the other one
out. Let's get the rest of the story and base a decision on facts.

Well, next time there is going to be a shooting like that, I'd want
to know who is going to volunteer to stand directly behind one of
the shooters.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

Did you notice the sentence about getting the facts? Was anyone
standing behind the shooters? There are many possible scenarios so
I'm not jumping to conclusions.

I'm just trying to emphasize that it was pure luck that no one else
was hurt by flying bullets.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

That is exactly what I meant by waiting for facts. How do you know it
was pure luck? Is there even such a thing as luck? How do you know
there was flying bullets? How many shots were fired? Could be shooter
No 1 waited until there was no one else in range. We don't know that
and yet you say it was pure luck. I don't believe it.

There were 2 shooters who shot each other dead. That's really the only
relevant facts that I know. (Yes, they were provoked by their wives, or
whatever the relationships were). In such a case I think it is indeed
pure luck that eithere only 2 shots were fired, or all the other shots (I
don't know the number fired) went either totally in the object of each
shooter or completely wide of anyone.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid