"Charlie Self" wrote in message

Yeah, you could. He could have spent the money protecting the U.S.

How? If you have a better plan, call or write your congress critter.

The concept of fighting wars, even broad ones against terrorism, away from
these shores if possible, is a good one. Sure, it cost's money, lots of it,
and lives ... but a damn sight fewer of _our_ women and children are lost
that way. How soon you forget.

I do love this bit though: Clinton had nothing to do with the good times
on his
watch, but all the crap that's falling on Bush is Clinton's fault.

As if the previous administration's inaction on terrorism had no impact
whatsoever on what you are seeing now.

I have tax returns from two businesses, along with a kid's dwindling college
fund, that prove inarguably the economy was faltering months _before_ Bush
took office. Then 9/11.

This is real easy to document for those who shy away from the knee jerk,
blame the other party, reactions to every issue that crops up.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/13/03