On Oct 28, 8:51*pm, Larry Jaques
wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:19:08 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrawled the following:







"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:46:02 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrawled the following:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...

P.S: What's the wife's take on your Sarah fetish?

My wife thinks that Sarah is in over her head and that John McCain must be
off his rocker.

That's likely true of -all- candidates for Prez, VP, and political
positions everywhere. *So what's new?

She also thinks that spending $150,000 for clothes is
insane, and she used to be a buyer for fashion departments in Macy's and
Stern's -- buying trips to Italy, and all that.

But SARAH didn't buy (or approve of) them.

At first it looked like Sarah was nutz. Now, with further reports, it's
clear that her aides are nutz.

What's the big problem?

Joe Sixpacks, hockey moms, working men and women, the middle class...and
$150,000 wardrobes. That's called "cognitive dissonance."

Only in the minds of people looking to ruin someone's rep. *Then
again, politics itself is cognitive dissonance.

Besides, Joe Sixpack didn't run for VP, but if he did, he'd want a
nice suit, eh? *That money was for, what?, a _year's_ outfits for the
woman and her entire family, and that was only -after- the Dems had
been dissing her current wardrobe. The aides decided to do something
about it and got a bit carried away, but it's really nothing. I wish
we had some figures from other nominees with which to compare.

****, Obama and Biden probably spend that much on new suits every
year, and they're _men_.

That's absurd.

OK, let's say $20k each, but not a penny less. *That kind of wardrobe
money would see -me- through the rest of my life. *

The wardrobe was for both Palin and her
entire family.

It's still nutz. It's for clothes for one month.

Ed, it was NOT clothes for a month. *It it was all the clothes,
makeup, and accessories since her nomination, for the convention,
stumping through the states, and covering her through her installation
as VP. *Clothes for an entire family for the better part of a year.

I wonder what Hillary's clothing allotment was for her run for Prez.
I'd give you million to one odds it easily beat the $159k. The
Clintons grossed $109 million last year. *I wish I had kept a copy of
Hillabitch's tax record page when it was still up. I'd show you.

Dems don't have anything better to criticize?

Sure. They have quite a laundry list. d8-)

I believe you misspelled "we" there, Ed. *You're right in there.
And their laundry list is as probably made by the same type of people
you don't like making laundry lists on Obama, but from the other side
of the aisle. *You'll believe theirs but not ours? *Mmm hmm.

She keeps trying to watch
Tina Fay on SNL but she falls asleep. g

Can you say "VCR"? *I knew you could.

The VCR died about four years ago. And our DVD player doesn't record.

Her loss.

Keep in mind that my wife is from Pontiac, Illinois, where you probably
would be considered a dangerous socialist. d8-)

=:0

You'd be in trouble there, pard'. I wear camo or overalls when I visit.

Oy vay!

--
Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The cost of the other candidates clothes is not an issue.

Each of the other three canidates, including McSame, have stated
they buy their own clothes. Only Palin, who reported her family
income last year as over $250,000.00, received anything.

dennis
in nca