On 2008-10-29, Larry Jaques novalidaddress@di wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:49:17 -0500, the infamous Ignoramus20172
scrawled the following:

On 2008-10-28, Larry Jaques novalidaddress@di wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:47:24 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrawled the following:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
m...

Just as you will be responsible for what your candidate does if he is
elected. I believe you have the heavier burden there, Ed.

It wouldn't matter who was elected, he's in for a hellish time. It would be
worse for McCain, with a Congress trying to pull in another direction.

Perhaps, but I was thinking about how the fit's gonna hit the shan
when Obama's projects end up costing us more than the war has.

The hope is that there is some benefit from these projects, unlike
from the war.

Isn't that like Paulson's "hope" that banks would use the @#$%@#$
bailout money to make _loans_?

Possibly, Obama will do something smarter with the money. Possibly, not.


If the party takes the high road, that'll be good. But if they revert
to their lower selves and turn super-conservative and moral-majoritize
(like my new word?) it again, they're in for real trouble, as they
should be.

I think that the Republican party is becoming marginalized.

No, the American people have become marginalized...by the media, our
politicians, and their puppeteers.

That's now how I personally feel.

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/