"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:31:00 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrawled the following:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
. ..
On 27 Oct 2008 02:49:18 GMT, the infamous Eregon Eregon@Saphira.ørg
scrawled the following:

"Ed Huntress" wrote in
:

Jeez, and here Sarah Palin thinks they're about as accurate as can be.
As she said on Oct. 4th, "Turns out one of Barack's earliest
supporters is a man who, according to the New York Times, and they are
hardly ever wrong..."

Do you know something she doesn't? Or is she really just as dumb as a
fence post?

She has an especially fine-tuned appreciation for Irony. G

Please don't post metalworking items in the metal newsgroups, Eregon.
This is a political group. :^)

Besides, you're just lengthening Ed's hardon for Sarah, if that's
possible. wink (Note to Ed: I voted for McCain and Palin
yesterday. I drop it in the mail today. Oregon is all vote-by-mail.)

Good for you! It's good to hear that you voted for a real candidate. Now

Heh heh heh. I thought you'd like that.


you're partly responsible for whatever happens, whether your candidate
wins
or loses. That's the price of democracy. d8-)

Just as you will be responsible for what your candidate does if he is
elected. I believe you have the heavier burden there, Ed.

It wouldn't matter who was elected, he's in for a hellish time. It would be
worse for McCain, with a Congress trying to pull in another direction.

And if so,
what'll you -do- once Sarah is gone from the media circus? snort

She won't be gone. Watch her make a play to be the de-facto leader of the
Republican Party, starting...oh, say last week. g

The Party is already polarized as a result of this election. If she has a
between-elections presence, she'll split it right in two. The Republicans
are going to have a battle for the new direction the Party will take.

--
Ed Huntress