Jim Yanik wrote in
:

Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:
Kurt Ullman wrote in

:

In article ,
Nate Nagel wrote:

Which brings us full circle to my original point. McCain has no
set convictions (say what you will about Bush, he has those -
he's almost always wrong, but at least he has convictions) so
it's impossible for me to vote for him.

But then that would also make it impossible for vote for Obama,
too.

Worse;the convictions Obama HAS already evidenced are those of
communism. If Nate really fears for the Constitution,OBAMA is the
one who will truly tear it apart.The Second Amendment will be the
first to go,followed closely by the First Amendment.

But ol Nate has drunk the Kool-aid.

Um, Obama used to teach Constitutional law.

Who says he got it right??
after all,he will not release any of his papers,thesis,etc.

He may be a Socialist,
but he has to have a better grasp on what the Constitution says and
means than Bush, McCain, et. al.

nate

How DELUDED by hate and BDS you are....


Obama'a words on nominating judges;
"We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize
what it's like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand
what it's like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled,
or old. And that's the criteria by which I'm going to be selecting
my judges."


He clearly believes in legislating from the bench.
Constitutional? I don't believe that.

what Constitution are you referrring to,Nate???

Do you believe in WRITTEN LAW?


your hero Bush doesn't, and that's a demonstrated fact.

then HOW could you vote for Obama?
He has publicly stated he will nominate judges who judge based on their
feelings,public opinion,and not the Constitution.
your voting for Obama would be irrational.

If this were the late 1700's he would have been tried and convicted of
treason by now.

nate


Except the USSC has ruled on Presidential powers during conflicts.


Nate,have you seen that YouTube video of Obama talking about his
redistribution of wealth scheme? It's from 2001.

this describes the text of it.
http://tinyurl.com/6kcaja

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net