Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
Nate Nagel wrote:

Which brings us full circle to my original point. McCain has no set
convictions (say what you will about Bush, he has those - he's
almost always wrong, but at least he has convictions) so it's
impossible for me to vote for him.

But then that would also make it impossible for vote for Obama,
too.
Obama simply by being younger hasn't had the same opportunities as
McCain to go on record with one position and then eight years later
support another one.

How BLIND you are;Obama has alrady reversed himself on many things.
(besides his voting "Present" 90% of the time)

The sad thing is, I would have voted for the Y2K
McCain, before he was destroyed by the same Karl Rove who's working
for the 2008 McCain.

I'll probably vote for Obama not because I want to but because I feel
that the current Republican administration is literally dangerous to
the American way of life

More blindness.

and McCain has done little to distance
himself from their policies and actions, his protestations of "I'm not
George Bush" notwithstanding. The Republican party needs to move away
- no, that's not strong enough, try "make a clean break" - from the
neocons and religious right and back towards a more Goldwater-esque
philosophy before I can ever consider supporting them.

I would be sorely tempted to vote Libertarian just to make a point if
it weren't for the fact that the election is still close enough that
there's a danger that that would allow McCain to win. That can't be
allowed, period. I do live in one of those states that is still "too
close to call" so I really don't feel that I can vote how I really
want to, I need to cast the vote that will keep McCain and Palin out.

nate


typical Liberal "thinking".


Gawd, you're a moron. Do you ever have any thoughts? Do they hurt?

nate


Ah,now we get into ad hominem attacks.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net