Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:
Kurt Ullman wrote in
:

In article ,
Nate Nagel wrote:

Which brings us full circle to my original point. McCain has no
set convictions (say what you will about Bush, he has those - he's
almost always wrong, but at least he has convictions) so it's
impossible for me to vote for him.

But then that would also make it impossible for vote for Obama,
too.


Worse;the convictions Obama HAS already evidenced are those of
communism. If Nate really fears for the Constitution,OBAMA is the one
who will truly tear it apart.The Second Amendment will be the first
to go,followed closely by the First Amendment.

But ol Nate has drunk the Kool-aid.


Um, Obama used to teach Constitutional law.

Who says he got it right??
after all,he will not release any of his papers,thesis,etc.

He may be a Socialist,
but he has to have a better grasp on what the Constitution says and
means than Bush, McCain, et. al.

nate

How DELUDED by hate and BDS you are....


Obama'a words on nominating judges;
"We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what
it's like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand what it's
like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And
that's the criteria by which I'm going to be selecting my judges."


He clearly believes in legislating from the bench.
Constitutional? I don't believe that.

what Constitution are you referrring to,Nate???

Do you believe in WRITTEN LAW?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net