Thread: Political signs
View Single Post
  #123   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Jim Yanik Jim Yanik is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,103
Default Political signs

Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote in
:

Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
"Bob F" wrote:


Really? No foreigners hate Bush? At all? Especially not ones
with weapons and no moral compunctions about killing those that
they feel are deserving of same?

You h ave any indication that they hate BUSH or just the person
who
is in the office. You think those with weapons and no compunction
to


no compunction -against- killing,I believe you mean...

kill are suddenly going to put down their weapons and participate
in mass sing alongs of "Kumbaya" suddenly in mid- January?
I doubt it, but likely their general, low-level hatred of people
that don't share their beliefs suddenly have a focus due to Bush's
actions.


That had that focus since Jimmy Carter's time.
Hezbollah(an Iranian creation) has been around a long time.

And that focus takes a long time to blur, so we'll be dealing wit
hthe aftermath for a while.

Had we actually cleaned up the neighborhood in Iraq (and Afghanistan
for that matter) quickly after the initial invasion (e.g. MASSIVE
commitment of police-type forces) things might have been different.
Unfortunately our leaders were too short sighted to not lose the war
after winning the battle.

nate


Well,Nate,similar mistakes and setbacks were made in just about every
war the US has been in,but we adjusted. (see Victor Davis Hanson's
articles..) One MAJOR thing different this time is that we no longer
had the support of the media.


Of course. Those who do not learn from history, et cetera. This is
why Bush et. cie. are failures. Do *you* support someone who keeps
doing the same thing over and over and expects a different outcome?
Isn't that a clinical definition of insanity?

nate


Major misconception;
Bush is NOT "doing the same thing over and over".
Bush made a strategic move for the ME with the Iraq war.
IMO,it was/is a good idea.

It WOULD have helped greatly if the DemocRATs had given true support
instead of being divisive and thus giving moral support to the enemy.
But they would rather appease the enemies of the US,thinking that will buy
them respect and good will.How naive.

DemocRATs,leftists,and socialists would rather see the US fail than Bush
succeed.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net