fred wrote:
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message
k...
We took a dog to a vet on Sunday for him to check out what turned out to
be a much more serious wound than it at first appeared and paid a bill of
£150.

We were given anti-biotics, but not a full course and asked to return the
animal mid week for another check up.

My understanding of anti-biotics is that if a course is started, the full
course should always be given. It seems a little odd therefore, not to
provide a full course on the first visit. Is this normal procedure or just
a method to ensure our return by giving these in small batches?

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk



ALL vets & dentists should be strangled at birth.

'We look after your best friend' my arse.
They look after themselves.
Money grabbing *******s.
I swear I'll throw a brick through their window, just to get my moneysworth.

P.S. they happen to **** me off something rotten.



Vets and dentists I can live with, they at least do provide a useful service,
How about we start off with estate agents... wait a minute a fair number
will be getting shafted with the downturn in house sales.
...and what about those scumbags in the stock market who have been creaming
it in for years shortselling and insider dealing.
then there's the lawyers...