Ok, Tom enlighten me, specifics on:

1. Raping and Pilaging
2. Damage to the enviornment
3. Impact on social structure


Tom Watson wrote:

On 08 Sep 2003 07:19:02 GMT, otforme (Charlie Self)
wrote:

Bush lied. Period. Presumably we did NOT go into Iraq to knock over a brutal
dictator, but to knock over an actual physical threat to the world. In fact,
the adminstration is now looking for rationales to replace that one which was
non-existent.

There hasn't been this much raping and pillaging going on since Atilla
last rode into town.

Once he and Dick Cheney get done dealing out the cards to their
buddies there surely won't be any aces left in the deck for the likes
of you and me.

It'll take years to undo the damage done by this squinty eyed little
twerp and some of the damage may simply be beyond repair. The cost to
our environment and our social structure will be paid out over
generations.

This whole thing with Iraq, the undemonstrated connection to Al Queda
and the vaporware WMD's is a three card monte scam and all the cards
say OIL on them. I'll bet ole Dick Cheney can't wait to strap on a
burnoose and belly up to table at OPEC. More likely he'll hide under
the table with his hand stuck up the ass of some puppet oil minister
who will be our man at The Big Show.

Those boys must feel the heat, too, because they sure are moving fast
and doing as much damage as possible in as short an amount of time as
possible. Guess they're cashing in up front and not figuring on that
second four years at the trough.

Of course, this is all opinion but I wish that the time to express my
opinion at the polls was not so far away.

Regards, Tom
Tom Watson - Woodworker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson