On Oct 6, 9:01 am, w_tom wrote:
On Oct 6, 1:23 am, bud-- wrote:

Still never shown – that there is protection inside even a significant
percentage of appliances.

Posted repeatedly were many internal protections found in all
appliances.
..
Posted *never* were internal protections found in all appliances.
..
If those spec numbers existed, Bud would have provided
them.
..
The lie repeated. Specs were posted in this thread (and numerous
others).
..
A protector is only as effective as its earth ground.
..
w__’s religious mantra protects him from conflicting thoughts (aka
reality).

Still no link to another lunatic that agrees with w_ that plug-in
suppressors are NOT effective.

Still never answered - embarrassing questions:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-
in suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest
solution"?
- How would a service panel suppressor provide any protection in the
IEEE example, pdf page 42?
- Why does the IEEE guide say in that example "the only effective way
of protecting the equipment is to use a multiport [plug–in]
protector"?
- Why does “responsible” manufacturer SquareD says "electronic
equipment may need additional protection by installing plug-in
[suppressors] at the point of use."
- Where is the link to a 75,000A and 1475Joule rated MOV for $0.10.
- Why should anyone believe there is surge protection "inside every
appliance".

For real science read the IEEE and NIST guides. Both say plug-in
suppressors are effective.

--
bud--