Maxwell Lol wrote:
Tim Daneliuk writes:

I don't know how. But just to make it clear to you: I do not reject
evolution as a mechanism out of hand. I reject the blind worship of
science as being the only way we can know truth.

Blind? You don't really understand the scientific method, do you?

I understand it quite well. The *method* is - as best as we can
make it - unbiased. But the people who practice it are not
unbiased. I spent a number of years in research. If it's not
clear to you, then let me be the first to clue you in. There
is *lots* of bias in the business of science. What gets published
does go through peer review. But what gets funded doesn't come
anywhere near to that level of standard. Moreover, a lot of
what does get funded never sees the light of day in publication.
When scientists wander around declaring the primacy of science
and the absence of God, as the radical atheists do regularly,
they are not practicing science, they are engaging in theology.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/