On Sep 19, 4:51*pm, "D'ohBoy" wrote:
On Sep 18, 8:59*am, Woodie wrote:

Lew Hodgett wrote:

You can't possibly come up with a cite for him railing for "total free
market", can you? Didn't think so. Stop making stuff up.

Actually, I heard a quote the other day stating that he was 'always
for less regulation'. *So if there is less regulation, but regulation
still existed, he would still be for less. *The only case in which his
desire for less would be satisfied, i.e., when there couldn't be *LESS
REGULATION* would be a total free market.

So no, Woodie didn't make it up. *So you stop. *Jackass.

And what is with this free market ****e? *I guess free markets are
good when people die due to that freedom, or little people get hurt
but when Republicans LOSE MONEY, that's just wrong.

Did you happen to see that Republican Senator (or Congressman, I don't
recall) the other night whining about how now is not the time to point
fingers?!

This IS the TIME!

THIS IS THE TIME WHEN THE SEEDS OF DESTRUCTION PLANTED BY THE
REPUBLICANS OVER YEARS OF GUTTING CONTROLS ON THE FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS ARE BEARING THEIR BITTER FRUIT. *EAT UP YOU SCUMSUCKING
*******S!

Man, this is gonna be so much fun when the Congress, Senate and White
House are all dominated by the Democrats. *Gonna be a lotta stinky
Repugnant carcass swinging from the gallows.....

D'ohBoy

What I get a kick out of, is all the neocon/fundie nutbars whining
that it was all Clinton's fault.

They were some laws passed during the Clinton years that certainly
were partially responsible for the mess, but the Oh-So-Smart business
savvy Repuglicans has 7.5 year to fix Clinton's wrongs.... Now Bush
wants "some extra/more" powers to fix things...is there nothing else
that asshole thinks about but "more power"????

You know, if Obama threw money at a problem like the Repuglicans would
be all over him for his socialist/tax-crazy ideas.