The message
from Terry Fields contains these words:

The guys quotes sourced data, with no mainpulation. Roger wanted data
and he got it in spades.

I got a lot of bull**** from a charlatan which I haven't time to go into
in detail right now and judging by other responses I was right not to
take it as gospel. Wikipedia is a much safer source. :-)

I take it then that although none of the particular points that I
quoted has been challenged, either on the group or by the baying mob,
that means nothing. Character assassination is, apparently,
everything.

Well done on the Ostrich Approach to the Uncomfortable.

As I said before there are none so blind as those who will not see.

As is often the case on Usenet you are trying to discredit your
opposition by ascribing to them the tactics you yourself are using.

I took issue with several of the more obviously suspect points. On that
you have so far exercised your right to silence.
--
Roger Chapman