On Sep 4, 2:07*am, "Hawke" wrote:
In light of the latest news, I started wondering why did Sarah Palin
suddenly elope with her husband and started googling for "track palin"
"born on". And I found something interesting.

Sarah Palin's son, Track Palin, was born on April 20, 1989.

http://www.alan.com/2008/08/29/conse...family-values/

Sarah married her husband on August 29, 1988.

Doing a simple math and making some assumptions, it becomes instantly
obvious why they actually "eloped". They eloped because Sarah was
pregnant for about a month as of the day of their wedding.

It looks like that's the order of things in Alaska, if it was good
enough for Jesus' Mom it's good enough for a US VP.

Holy cripes, it was an immaculate conception?

Not hardly. It is just the same old same old. Hypocrisy from the party
of
"values". Clearly, it runs in the Palin family to engage in premarital
sex.
But isn't abstaining from sex until after marrying what the republican
party
preaches all the time? It's just more of the family values that
republicans
like to profess to putting great store in but in reality pay no
attention to
in their own lives. We believe in this but we do the opposite. Yep, that
about sums up what republicans are all about. It's a grand party all
right.
Grand hypocrites they are.

Hawke

Yeah, like Pretty Boy Edwards, who had an extra-marital sex with a
staffer while his wife was/is terminally ill with cancer then had the
timerity to lie about it.

As did Gingrich, etc. etc. *It's not a party line sin.

At least the good Governor brought it out in
the open. So what if she and/or her daughter had pre-marital sex. If
you check with the average American I'd bet that more than 80% of them,
on both sides, have. I saw on one of the "news" channels this morning
that Governor Palins husband had a DUI arrest in 1986! ?What the ****
does that have to do with ANYTHING except be another piece of left wing
crap slung by the left leaning (leaning so far that they're about to
fall over) media hoping that something will stick. Let's face it folks,
if you're in politics you're pretty much a liar and hypocrit regardless
of party affiliation.

My point, exactly. *So why are you confining your comments to the
"left wing"?

Because he belongs to the right wing and only sees the wrongs on the
Democrat's side. For instance, he says what did Palin's husband's DUI arrest
in 1986 have to do with anything. I would remind them that they brought up
Bill Clinton's pot smoking when he was in college and in Europe to boot.
What did that have to do with anything?

In both cases, nothing at all. Even George Bush's DUI may be
irrelevant.

So here you have the right wing
going all the way back to Clinton's college days to find a fault with him
but when the same thing is done to them he's outraged. It's the same with
the Swift Boating of John Kerry. If the Democrats start a campaign to make
McCain's wartime actions look bad will he complain about it?

Actually, didn't Rove start a rumor that McCain was a bit unhinged
from his
(McCain's) POW days? Didn't it turn the Republican primary to Bush in
2000?

Of course. They
just don't get it that what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
They have done every dirty trick in the book to try to get elected and when
the same things are used against them they cry and whine. To me when I hear
the republicans crying about how dirty the Democrats are it just tells me
they are getting some of their own medicine. They're just a bunch of god
damn babies.

Go ahead and say how you really feel about this ;-)

Hawke- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -