Buddy Matlosz wrote:
"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
Buddy Matlosz wrote:
"Mark & Juanita" wrote in message
...
krw wrote:
In article ,
says...
Buddy Matlosz wrote:
schnip
He will show examples
of this change and give his opinion on what it is
that makes something not only a piece of Shaker furniture
but an exciting piece of Shaker furniture.
Kind of a contradiction of terms, idn't it?
Those Shakers are an exciting group!
To the Amish... G
Not true. The Amish have sex. ;-)
... and that, boys and girls, is why there are still Amish among
us
while there are no longer any Shakers.
Yeah, but with all that inbreeding, it's a question of quality,
not
quantity.
Huh? In what way do you consider the Amish to lack "quality"?
What part of "inbreeding" did you not understand?
So are they bleeders, do they commonly have two heads, in what way
does this "inbreeding" manifest itself so as to constitute a lack of
"quality"?
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)