"Millwright Ron" wrote in message
...

...


Ron, you forgot to mention the thing in Texas a number of years ago, where
a supervisor was shot and killed "in the furtherance of a union strike" and
the killers admitted the shooiting, and were not punished. The father of
three, not at all involved in the "strike", and by law, above the game,
callously murdered by strikers with no remorse. You DO remember that one,
don't you. It was the case that set the precedent for all that cases such
as:

MURDOCK
http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock060903.asp

And
UNITED STATES V. ENMONS, 410 U. S. 396 (1973)
http://supreme.justia.com/us/410/396/case.html#412

All of which pertty well knocks your diatribe of ancient history ignoring
the evils of the unionists into the can.

But keep on writing, diatribes such as this recent one of yours are
necessary so that thinking men do not fall into the habit of taking your
word for it. Reflection, that'sthe key.

Thanks,

Flash