"Andy Hall" wrote in message news:4894e379@qaanaaq...
On 2008-08-02 23:38:41 +0100, "dennis@home"
said:



"Andy Hall" wrote in message news:4894d5ec@qaanaaq...
On 2008-08-02 22:42:59 +0100, Andy Burns
said:

On 02/08/2008 22:35, Andy Hall wrote:

Would you still have the same opinion had it been you that had been
the patient in cardiac arrest with a few minutes before permanent
brain damage would have set in?

Presumably in this case having to stop after the accident negated the
time saved by speeding?

Only because a dog was involved.

Had you been the patient, what action would you have liked?


I'm sure you would have kids and other innocents run down to get to you.
However most would prefer the driver to take a bit more care.

We don't have the full details other than that there was plenty of
signaling that an emergency vehicle was approaching. This is not the
same as any old car driving along.

Yes it is.
Ambulance drivers have the same if not more duty of care as any other
driver.


Answer the question. If you had been the patient, would you have
preferred the ambulance to get to you quickly or would you have preferred
to be dead?

*You* appear to prefer killing people, that's the important thing here.
We now know you value your life above others.